Active voice examples software#

(Discussion, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing) The results of this study showed that severe hypothermia did not develop in either group. You may also use the sections of your own report or a graph or figure as the subject of your sentences: while a large body of literature has explored large-scale geographical patterns, and several recent papers have studied disease dynamics in a metapopulation framework, few empirical studies have focused on the patterns and mechanisms behind disease clusters at small spatial scales (“disease foci”), especially in wild host–pathogen systems. In your literature review, you can attribute results from across a range of sources while keeping your sentence active and conveying useful information about the nature of those sources: have reported a theoretical study of wake formation in the presence of a magnetic field parallel and perpendicular to the ion flow direction. Learn some basic techniques for introducing active voice outside of the Methods section The number of haplotypes (h), haplotype (Hd), and nucleotide (π) diversity were evaluated using DnaSP 5.10 program. Alignment was performed using the ClustalW program provided in the MEGA package v.5.

Active voice examples software#

Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the Staden 1.53 software package. Was it the same person in each case or different ones? What was their specialty? What technical means did they use to achieve their results? All this remains vague.īy contrast, in the Methods section we at least know that the authors of the article were the agents in each and every step: The problem here is that the reader has no way of knowing from the sentences themselves who was responsible for each of the findings. Autosomal dominant PD was demonstrated to result not only from the most common G2019S mutation, but also from at least five other mutations. In addition, LRRK2 mutations were not detected in other neurological disorders. All of the mutations (mostly, missense mutations) were found in heterozygote, segregated with the disease and were not detected in a control sample. More than 50 LRRK2 mutations are known now. Let’s compare two passages from the same issue of Molecular Biology, both written in the passive voice. There’s a good reason for preferring active constructions outside of the Methods section.

Even if your course requires you to use passive in the Methods section, do not shy away from active in the other sections Some, such as Physical Review, are more indirect, stating a preference for “clear, simple sentence structure.”ĭrawing on examples from contemporary science journals, this handout identifies some key strategies for injecting more active voice into your science reports. Several influential science journals- Science, Nature, and the British Medical Journal, among others-are quite explicit in this preference. Slowly, science journals are returning to a preference for the active voice, and university science departments are following suit, though they have lagged behind somewhat.

‘Beagle,'” Darwin writes at the start of On the Origin of Species, “I was much struck with certain facts in the distribution of the inhabitants of South America,” and he continues in this direct manner for several hundred pages of close observation and argument. For the better part of the twentieth century, passive voice held sway in the sciences, and science journals by and large shunned the first person-singular or plural.